The myth of Prometheus, with the gift of fire, Pandora, the long suffering on the rock and the liver-eating eagle, and the accidental? prophesied? release brought about by Heracles continues to intrigue and fascinate. What does this story suggest about the human condition, about limitation, about suffering, about consciousness? What is the fire? Was, is, Prometheus a hero?
Interpreters of the myth give different answers to these questions, answers that reflect the changing concerns of the culture, the personality of the interpreter, and the enduring value of this strange story. This is mythopoesis, engagement and re-making of myth, and we do it all of the time. I've come across a few mythopoetical variations on Prometheus that you might want to investigate, variations that give different meanings to the story that Hesiod tells as a straightforward lesson: do wrong and get punished, cross the gods and suffer for your stupidity. According to Hesiod, who wrote his version around 800 B.C., Prometheus was wrong, end of story.
Flash forward 400 years to the tragedian Aeschylus and now Prometheus is a hero, must be a hero for us, because without him, human beings would not survive. Prometheus is creator and benefactor. Prometheus also sets an example for human life, that is, it is human to push against the limits and human to suffer. That is the beautiful tragedy of human life. This interpretation reflects and extends the evolution in Greek religion and philosophy, in their political and social organization, and in their art. The Greeks gave us (as members of Western culture) our notions of the human as noble and as heroic,they gave us the idea that humans can approach the gods through the cultivation of reason, virtue, and art, they experimented first with democracy.
Flash forward even further to 1820 and Percy Bysshe Shelley. People have lived through the American and French revolutions, have seen the dawn of the industrial age and are debating the progress of society. What is being gained, what is being lost, and how can human society be perfected? In his poem "Prometheus Unbound," Shelley writes a revolutionary work in support of hope and mercy and the powerful knowledge of the heart. In Shelley's view, the Olympians beat the Titans because the Olympians valued knowledge and the Titans were ignorant. The Titan Prometheus is an exception and sides with Zeus, who he later surpasses. Prometheus "wins" the rivalry with Zeus because Prometheus gains, through suffering injustice, the knowledge of the heart, empathy---something that Zeus never does understand. Reflecting on his own times, Shelley argues that Enlightenment reason and science alone are not enough and can never lead to a moral and beautiful society.
About the same time, Mary Shelley writes Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus. Mary shares her husband's concern for the heart. But she goes further to argue against what she believes is a huge problem with a one-sided attachment to "reason," a technology fueled hubris. If humans think they are gods and try to act as gods, disaster will follow. This reminds me of the fate of the Titanic, the ship that was too big and too well-built to sink... kind of like our banks.
One last example is Goethe. In his poem "Prometheus," (which I'll post) he focuses on Prometheus as a being in the middle, not human and also not a god, not an Olympian, and more to the point, not a god because he cares about and sides with the human. Prometheus is in the middle and he founds the realm of the in-between, the human realm. One characteristic of this middle position, of being in-between, is alienation and loneliness. Alienation, Goethe says, is the most commonly shared characteristic of modern life, and our model is Prometheus.
More information about all of these variations is available on the web and elsewhere. If you come across another interesting angle, pass it long. This is a world made of stories.